Skip to main content
Events

OWASP Stockholm - Secure Agentic SDLC & Autonomous Pentesting Coverage

Tickets
LIVE
Meetup

Scila AB

OWASP Stockholm - Secure Agentic SDLC & Autonomous Pentesting Coverage

Scila AB, stockholmWednesday, Oct 14 · 11:30 AM
Doors 11:30 AM

The Story

Join us for a packed in-person OWASP event at Scila AB with talks on Security in the Agentic SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle) and The Coverage Failure in Autonomous Pentesting. 📢 **Important news**: Meetup will be decommissioned at the end of the year, so RSVP will be moving to our OWASP Chapter page then. To stay updated on future events, join the chapter here: 🔗 [https://owasp.org/chapters/stockholm](https://owasp.org/chapters/stockholm) **🗓️ When:** 14th of October, 17:30 - 20:00 **📍 Where:** Scila AB - Sveavägen 17, 111 27 Stockholm. **🚀 Agenda:** 17:30 - 18:00 Gathering and meeting industry peers. 18:00 - 18:05 Intro. 18:05 - 18:40 Talk 1 18:40 - 19:00 Break and mingling. 19:00 - 19:40 Talk 2 19:40 - 20:00 Closing words & meeting industry peers. **🌟More about the talks:** **A Simple Guide To Security in the Agentic SDLC** ***Ernest Bartosevic*** The SDLC we built assumes security happens at gates: threat modeling during design, a review on the PR, scanning after deploy. That only works if humans have the time to look and actually care while juggling 30 different tasks. Many people will tell you we are "cooked" - but security has adapted before. We rebuilt the whole practice when waterfall gave way to agile. This talk is a practical guide to turning coding agents into the guardians of your security, rather than the source of your next incident. It covers which gates still stand, which ones need to move, and how to give agents the context, guardrails and feedback loops to enforce ***your*** policies, so AI becomes a co-pilot you can trust. **The Coverage Failure in Autonomous Pentesting** ***Yacine Souam*** Most autonomous pentesting systems use either a fixed pool of specialist agents or a single agent that recursively spawns copies. Both fail by losing control of breadth: fixed pools spread effort evenly, while pure recursion goes depth-first, burns budget on early leads, and leaves major surfaces untested. The research reframes pentesting as

Report this event

Get There

Similar Events

Wednesday, October 14 · 11:30 AM

Get tickets